Claim checks
Automated claim checks flag absolute promises and unsourced figures before a person approves. By default they block only critical claims, so your reviewer still checks the rest.
Built for industries where credibility is the product. Automated checks can flag issues, and qualified reviewers must approve relevant claims before publication.
Automated checks and AI-simulated reader perspectives do not establish accuracy or regulatory compliance.
The problem
Three reasons fintech teams publish less than their buyers need to read.
See how briefs are builtEvery draft needs legal-adjacent review, so marketing ships four posts a year while competitors ship four a week.
Fintech buyers research obsessively: security, pricing, regulation. If your site does not answer, a competitor or an affiliate blog does.
An invented statistic in a fintech post is not embarrassing, it is a regulatory conversation. Unreviewed AI publishing is simply not an option.
Research, fintech-flavoured
Research uses your last-synced Search Console data and approved business sources. The Ciny team syncs Search Console on demand. Competitor research is in build, so a research brief is not proof of a working competitor-tracking feature.
Signals in
Brief out
Prepared by Julia · R&D for your review.
A sample month
Illustrative topics in the fintech register. You approve every idea before it renders.
How content is reviewedA schedule helps coordinate approved content and avoid rushed publication. Search performance depends on relevance, usefulness and other factors, not publishing frequency alone. Review each piece for a distinct reader need before release.
Your real plan comes from your keyword data and brand pack. These topics are illustrative, not measured results or a performance forecast.

The crew on your account
Two layers of automated checks, then the person who owns sign-off.
Meet the whole crewAutomated claim checks flag absolute promises and unsourced figures before a person approves. By default they block only critical claims, so your reviewer still checks the rest.
AI-simulated analyst and buyer perspectives may flag questionable claims. They are not qualified compliance reviewers and can miss errors.
Where the SEO module is connected, reviews the Search Console queries your site already appears for, such as security, pricing and regulation questions, and briefs content that answers them.
Nothing publishes without a person's approval. The Ciny team approves only after the compliance sign-off you agree.
Where to start
Start with trust content and source facts your reviewers can check.
Read the case studiesPlan security explainers, pricing pages and regulation commentary, with approval steps agreed before release.
Make your security, pricing and product facts clear and easy to check on pages you control.
Specific briefs, business evidence, source checks and editorial review, explained step by step.
Not by default. Publishing is review-first, and a client's configuration cannot switch on Auto Publish. The Ciny team publishes only after the sign-off you agree.
Content may only state figures recorded in your Data Hub proof file, and automated claim checks flag unsourced figures and absolute promises before a person approves. The AI persona panel provides simulated feedback, not independent verification or compliance approval. A qualified human must check sources and claims.
Trust content: security explainers, pricing transparency, regulation commentary, comparison pages. Search Console shows which of those questions already bring people to your site, and the brief starts there.
Credentials sit in a per-client vault, and the Ciny team sees masked key names, never values. Each client also has its own dashboard installation and data store, and requests from another client are rejected.
Tell us who owns compliance sign-off and which sources your team trusts. We agree the scope before any work starts.