Getting your business cited inside AI answers is real and it matters. What is not real is the certainty being sold around it. The industry uses AEO, GEO, AIO and LLMO more or less interchangeably, with no consensus definition between them. We are building for it. It is not ready, and this page explains the landscape rather than pretending we have solved it.
AI Search · roadmapPart of the SEO module. Switched on and off per account, so you never pay for a module sitting idle.
AEO targets direct answers, GEO targets generative systems more broadly, AIO and LLMO are used for both. In practice agencies write AEO/GEO because the two have converged.
Clear entities, unambiguous claims, and facts a model can attribute to you. Most of this overlaps with writing well and marking up properly.
There is no equivalent of Search Console for AI answers. Anyone quoting you a precise citation rate should be asked how they got it.
The reason this says Coming rather than Early access is that we do not have a measurement story we believe yet.
Search volume: Google Keyword Planner, United States, pulled 31 Aug 2026. Every other number is measured on our own site.
Nothing in the current system targets AI answer surfaces, and there is no measurement layer for citation. The structured-data and entity work that feeds it is partly present in the content module, but it is not a shipped capability.
Both terms are used for roughly the same work and no consensus definition exists. Agencies commonly write AEO/GEO. We use AI Search as the plain-English name and treat the acronyms as synonyms.
We are not going to claim that. There is no reliable measurement layer for citation yet, so a promise like that cannot be verified by you or by us.
Indirectly. Clear structure and unambiguous claims help, and that is already how content is produced. It is a side effect of doing the work properly, not a module you can switch on.
Also in SEO: Keyword Discovery Automation · Rank Tracking Automation